A disagreement

I think it’s obvious to disagree with this decision of Bombay high court, so do I

In today’s world when the threat of sexual assault knocks the conscience of every girl each time they step outside their homes, this decision of Bombay high court is mocking more towards the security of girls. What does it mean to say “skin-to-skin contact must be there for sexual assault”! After saying this what is the need to wash hands with the statement like “It can be called as a criminal force to outrage modesty of women”! Defining such a heinous crime in this manner and distinguishing that into different tiers is just a way of boosting the knowledge of the sex predators regarding ten types of sexual abuse with a hundred types of punishment. Law is making the culprits wise and questioning the degree of suffering to the prey. What an irony it is! Tell me what is the necessity of evidence regarding if the touch is under the salwar or over the salwar when it is done against the consent of the victim. If skin-to-cloth contact is less punishable than that of skin-to-skin contact then the same piece of cloth which protects a girl from molestation is responsible for escaping the heinous sexual assaulters from the clutches of severe penalty and mortification.

This decision of the court may be a step towards reducing false sexual accusation. But it is crystal clear that the court has turned a blind eye to the trauma of real molestation victims.

©ruchiabhisikta12

12 thoughts on “A disagreement

  1. Good afternoon, ruchiabhisikta

    Thank you from the bottom of my heart
    for your presentation
    Your accusation against us men

    – the way we
    the men
    the dignity of women
    hurt every day

    I am ashamed
    as a man and please
    for ours caused by men
    thousands of years old crimes
    to women and children

    – and that to this day

    for forgiveness

    Hans Gamma

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Thank you for your thoughts.

        My answer:

        Humanity, we all are.

        That, we, the men, the dignity of women underestimate, (equality), I want to emphasize.

        Where the woman, I am not a woman, violates the dignity of the man with her possibility of power, only a woman can know that for herself.

        I say goodbye to you and I wish you the very best.

        regards
        Hans Gamma

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Sadly Cultures that
    Still See Women

    For Sale

    Are Only

    Concerned

    If The Goods Are

    Soiled For

    Purchased

    Use Indeed

    Part Of Why

    The Indian

    High Court

    Rules Molestation

    Clothed is Not

    Abuse The

    Goods Were

    Not Defiled

    Yet Women

    Do Have

    Souls Deeper

    Than Skin

    Deep

    Scarred

    Forever

    Clothed And

    Molested or Not

    Shallow Men

    Stolen

    Souls

    Of Children

    Vacant Eyes

    Soulless of

    Children

    To Come

    What

    Fear

    And

    Hate
    PLuS iGNorance
    Of Soul Sows, Reaps,
    Rapes, Maims, Kills

    Most

    Life

    Not

    Worth

    Living

    No Value of Soul
    Bought And
    Sold

    As

    A

    Marriage
    Becomes
    Institutional
    Rape on A First

    Night

    Too
    Bought

    And Sold
    With No

    Feelings

    Of Love

    The Children
    Will Suffer Most

    Again

    The

    Real

    Killer of Human
    Soul Ignorance of Breath

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s